<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>The Kingston Real Estate Blog</title>
        <link>http://www.kingstonrealestateblog.com/</link>
        <description>Information and News about Kingston real estate including articles, editorial and commentary on the real estate market in Kingston, Ontario, Canada.</description>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 10:48:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
        
        <item>
            <title>RE/MAX Recreational Property Report 2010 Released</title>
            <description><![CDATA["Aging baby boomers are having a serious impact on recreational<br />property sales, driving demand for year-round product on<br />lakes and rivers in the Kingston area. The number of waterfront<br />properties sold in the first quarter of this year is up 26<br />per cent over 2009 levels on popular Lake Ontario, Loughborough<br />Lake, Thousand Islands, and the Rideau River."<br /><br />Kingston &amp; Area is on Page 23 - 24.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.remax-oa.com/media-newsroom/article/59/">http://www.remax-oa.com/media-newsroom/article/59/</a><br /><div><br /></div>

<div style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;" class="zemanta-pixie"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/ff8a6bc7-f53c-40e4-b70f-24b9e97df4c1/" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]"><img style="border: medium none; float: right;" class="zemanta-pixie-img" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=ff8a6bc7-f53c-40e4-b70f-24b9e97df4c1" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script type="text/javascript" src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" defer="defer"></script></span></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.kingstonrealestateblog.com/2010/06/remax-recreational-property-re.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.kingstonrealestateblog.com/2010/06/remax-recreational-property-re.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Kingston Real Estate</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Re/Max</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Kingston Ontario</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Loughborough Lake</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Thousand Islands</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 10:48:27 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>The CMHC Spring 2010 Housing Market Outlook</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>The CMHC Spring 2010 Housing Market Outlook for Kingston is now available:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kingstonhouses.com/65450_2010_B01.pdf">http://www.kingstonhouses.com/65450_2010_B01.pdf</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.kingstonrealestateblog.com/2010/06/the-cmhc-spring-2010-housing-m.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.kingstonrealestateblog.com/2010/06/the-cmhc-spring-2010-housing-m.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Kingston Real Estate</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:08:38 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Lowe&apos;s files for appeal to build in west end</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Thank god! Lowe's has formally filed an appeal with the OMB (Ontario Municipal Board). We got lucky here, they could have just as easily given up and walked away. <br /><br />Now, let's see council do the right thing and reverse their earlier decision (voted down 7 to 6). I predict a severe backlash if they decide to fight this, spending tax payers money in the process.<br /><br />Here's the link to the Kingston This Week story:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.kingstonthisweek.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=1252452">http://www.kingstonthisweek.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=1252452</a><br /><div><br /></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.kingstonrealestateblog.com/2008/10/lowes-files-for-appeal-to-buil.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.kingstonrealestateblog.com/2008/10/lowes-files-for-appeal-to-buil.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Kingston News</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Planning Applications</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">planning</category>
            
            <pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 09:19:44 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Kingston September Sales Report</title>
            <description><![CDATA[I am not a big fan of publishing real estate statistics, especially
here in Kingston as our board covers such a large and diverse area with
a wide selection of housing. You have to be careful determining the
"Average Residential Price".<br /><br />"The jurisdictional area of the Kingston &amp; Area Real Estate
Association includes the County of Frontenac (Kingston, North Frontenac
Township, Central Frontenac Township, South Frontenac Township &amp;
Frontenac Islands Township), the County of Lennox and Addington
(Greater Napanee, Stone Mills Township, Addington Highlands Township
and Loyalist Township), the County of Leeds and all incorporated
villages, towns and cities within the same geographic area."<br /><br /><b>This is large area!</b>
Depending on location, we can have a difference of a $100,000 or more
for the same house. This is a huge percentage of the "Average
Residential Price" which was $230,473 in September.<br /><br />Non the less,
they do tell a story about the overall Market, and it seems a Real
Estate Blog should have them. <br /><br />The September highlights are: (August in Brackets)<br /><br /><ul><li>September $ Sales: $76,578,476 ($76,719,7340)</li><li>September Residential Transactions: 308 (316)<br /></li><li>Average residential price: $230,473 ($231,365)</li><li>New Residential Listings: 577 (515)<br /></li><li>Active Residential Listings: 1675 (1810)<br /></li></ul><br />Here is the link for the September summary.<br /><br /><a href="http://creastats.crea.ca/king/">http://creastats.crea.ca/king/</a> ]]></description>
            <link>http://www.kingstonrealestateblog.com/2008/10/kingston-september-sales-repor.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.kingstonrealestateblog.com/2008/10/kingston-september-sales-repor.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Kingston Real Estate</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Monthly Stats</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">stats</category>
            
            <pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 08:57:57 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Re/Max TV Spot from Germany</title>
            <description><![CDATA[I just stumbled upon this on You Tube. Very well done!<br /><br /><br /> <a style="left: 425px ! important; top: 0px ! important;" title="Click here to block this object with Adblock Plus" class="abp-objtab-05523716594670408 visible ontop" href="http://www.youtube.com/v/_ic5GFBFjAg&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"></a><a style="left: 425px ! important; top: 0px ! important;" title="Click here to block this object with Adblock Plus" class="abp-objtab-05523716594670408 visible ontop" href="http://www.youtube.com/v/_ic5GFBFjAg&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"></a><a style="left: 425px ! important; top: 0px ! important;" title="Click here to block this object with Adblock Plus" class="abp-objtab-05523716594670408 visible ontop" href="http://www.youtube.com/v/_ic5GFBFjAg&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"></a><a style="left: 425px ! important; top: 0px ! important;" title="Click here to block this object with Adblock Plus" class="abp-objtab-05523716594670408 visible ontop" href="http://www.youtube.com/v/_ic5GFBFjAg&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"></a><a style="left: 425px ! important; top: 0px ! important;" title="Click here to block this object with Adblock Plus" class="abp-objtab-05523716594670408 visible ontop" href="http://www.youtube.com/v/_ic5GFBFjAg&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"></a><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_ic5GFBFjAg&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_ic5GFBFjAg&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></object>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.kingstonrealestateblog.com/2008/09/remax-tv-spot-from-germany.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.kingstonrealestateblog.com/2008/09/remax-tv-spot-from-germany.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Re/Max</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Re/Max</category>
            
            <pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 19:24:26 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>It&apos;s About That Wallpaper</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Wallpaper is a highly personal thing.&nbsp; With almost any pattern, you can
love it or hate it.&nbsp; You could go for paisley or tropical flowers, or
maybe something more neutral, with beiges and pale blues in some sort
of geometric pattern.&nbsp; But other people, even in your immediate family,
might not share your taste, whatever it might be.<br /><br />It seems that
whatever one chooses, it can become dated as quickly as the last
decade's favorite appliance color.&nbsp; At that point, your choice is to
remove it altogether or paint or paper over it. &nbsp;<br /><br />Anyone who is
considering selling a house at any time in the near future, removing
old wallpaper is probably the best choice - usually you have to steam
it off.&nbsp; If you do that and paint your walls your favorite shade of
fuchsia, repainting when it's time to sell is easy, and even if you
leave it fuchsia, your buyers can change it inexpensively with a few
cans of Benjamin Moore.<br /><br />But the chances are that most of the
people looking at your home will not be enamored of your wallpaper.&nbsp;
Their mental calculation of the costs of removing it, restoring the
walls and then painting will probably far exceed the actual amount it
will take to get rid of the stuff properly.<br /><br />If you're sloppy and
just paint over old wallpaper, it will be evident to any discerning
eye.&nbsp; There will be telltale seam lines.&nbsp; And slapping on a coat of
paint will make the inevitable removal even more expensive.<br /><br />So,
if you've just purchased a home and are considering wallpaper, think
long and hard before you actually hang it.&nbsp; And if you are preparing
your house for sale, don't take it personally if your agent or stager
recommends that you steam it off the paper you so lovingly chose and
put up, and paint. &nbsp;<br /><br />Just do it.<br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://www.kingstonrealestateblog.com/2008/09/its-about-that-wallpaper.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.kingstonrealestateblog.com/2008/09/its-about-that-wallpaper.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Renovations</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">wallpaper</category>
            
            <pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 17:41:16 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Council rejects Lowe&apos;s request</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Well, council turned Lowe's down, in a 7-6 vote. The only option left now for this site is an OMB hearing. Lowe's has hinted that, but not confirmed.<br /><br />Here's a link to the Whig Standard story:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.thewhig.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=1203236">http://www.thewhig.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=1203236</a><br /> <div><br /></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.kingstonrealestateblog.com/2008/09/council-rejects-lowes-request.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.kingstonrealestateblog.com/2008/09/council-rejects-lowes-request.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Planning Applications</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">planning</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 09:06:04 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Last chance for Lowe&apos;s</title>
            <description><![CDATA["It's preferred site or nothing, retailer insists"<br /><br />As I wrote on September 2nd, the Planning Committee rejected Lowe's request for a zoning change to accommodate a new Lowe's building at 1085 Gardiners Road. Tonight, they ask City Council to approve it.<br /><br />Here's a link to the Whig Standard story:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.thewhig.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=1201069">http://www.thewhig.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=1201069</a><br /> <div><br /></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.kingstonrealestateblog.com/2008/09/last-chance-for-lowes.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.kingstonrealestateblog.com/2008/09/last-chance-for-lowes.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Planning Applications</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">planning</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 16:25:46 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Oil storage tank leak a cautionary tale</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<di3>"A</di3> scary tale of an oil leak in an Ottawa-area home provides a valuable lesson for homeowners whose homes are heated by oil."<br /><br />Yes, Oil tanks are becoming a problem in the sale of Real Estate. Underground oil tanks are out and out impossible. Walk away.<br /><br />Aboveground Oil tanks are the norm, and simply put, Insurance companies do not like them. If you read the article you will see why. The problem I have, is that most home owners with oil tanks are not aware of the "new regulations".<br /><br />Here is the section that applies:<br /><br /> It is a legislative requirement prescribed by Ontario Regulation 213/01, "Fuel Oil". Section 7 of the Regulation states:<br /><br /><table width="450" bgcolor="#ffffff" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<table width="100%" bgcolor="#ffffff" border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="1">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="textB" align="center" bgcolor="#dedab7">Section 7 of the Regulation </td></tr><tr>
<td class="text" align="left" bgcolor="#f5f4ea">"7.
(1) No distributor shall supply fuel oil to a container or tank system
that is connected to an appliance or work unless the distributor is
satisfied that the installation and use of the appliance or work comply
with this Regulation and, <ul>(a) Unless the distributor has inspected the appliance or work at least once within the previous 10 years". </ul>
"7. (2) A distributor shall prepare a report on each inspection made
under subsection (1) and shall retain the report until the next
inspection and report are completed".<br /><br />"7. (3) An inspection shall be carried out by a person who is the holder of a certificate for that purpose". </td></tr></tbody></table></td></tr></tbody></table><br /><u>Additional Information:</u><ul><li>This
is a mandatory inspection and therefore you must not refuse the
inspection service being arranged by a fuel oil distributor. </li><li>Inspection service refusal will prevent fuel oil delivery. </li><li>A
person who is the holder of a certificate for that purpose shall carry
out the inspection. I.e. An oil burner technician (OBT). </li><li>The
certified oil burner technician (OBT) may not necessarily work for the
fuel oil distributor but may be an agent or sub-contractor of the Fuel
Oil distributor. </li><li>You may contact a fuel oil distributor who
is different from the one you currently deal with if you are not
satisfied with the service being provided. </li><li>Each distributor
is responsible for the inspection performed on their client's heating
systems. When you switch to a new distributor you may be required to
undergo a new inspection. If you change distributors and the new
distributor agrees with the previous inspection report, a new
inspection may not be necessary. Check with the new distributor to see
if they would accept the previous inspection report. </li><li>Both
TSSA and fuel oil industry representatives have developed specific
checklists that outline minimum inspection requirements. </li><li>There are also inspection requirements for propane systems and natural gas systems. </li><li>See also Comprehensive inspections - Cost considerations and Comprehensive inspections - Disagreeing with results. </li></ul><br />Imagine the home owners surprise when they sell their home with an Oil Tank, for which they have been receiving oil, and the Buyer/Home Inspector/Realtor informs them that their tank "might not" be up to code and we need a TSSA certificate. Imagine their further surprise when they find out the tank and lines do not pass, and they need to be replaced at a cost of approx $1,000. They are now upset with the Buyer/Home Inspector/Realtor, for something that this legislation clearly says is the&nbsp; fuel oil distributors responsibility. <br /><br />Didn't we see the <a href="http://www.tssa.org/">TSSA's</a> name mentioned in the Propane explosion in Toronto? Are they maybe passing more laws than they are capable of enforcing?<br /><br />Here is a link to Bob Aaron's article in the Star. The hole in the tank was the size of the tip of a pen...<br /><br /><a href="http://www.yourhome.ca/homes/article/497042">http://www.yourhome.ca/homes/article/497042    </a><br /><div><br /><br /></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.kingstonrealestateblog.com/2008/09/oil-storage-tank-leak-a-cautio.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.kingstonrealestateblog.com/2008/09/oil-storage-tank-leak-a-cautio.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Canadian Real Estate</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Kingston Real Estate</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Renovations</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">oil</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">tssa</category>
            
            <pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 10:10:23 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Lowe&apos;s Application refused for new store</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<b><u>REFUSED</u></b>. Lowe's Home Improvement had applied for an Official Plan Amendment and a Zoning By-Law Amendment for a new store at 1085 Gardiners Road. (West side of Gardiners Road at Norris Court, south of Tim Horton's warehouse, North of Richvale York Block).<br /><br />This was going to be a large store on 6 hectares (15 acres), with a total floor area of 16,167 square meters (174,000 sq. ft.)&nbsp; which would be 35,000 - 55,000 sq. ft. larger than Home Depot or Rona. <br /><br />The land is zoned for Industrial purposes, Lowe's would need Commercial zoning. Planning Department has stuck with their guns, that area is for Industrial, Business Parks and the like. <br /><br />
Maybe they will take another look at Kings Crossing (Division &amp; 401) ?<br /><br />The full report is 111 pages....<br /><br /><a href="http://www.cityofkingston.ca/pdf/cityhall/committees/planning/agenda/2008/PLN_A1608-SchedA.pdf">http://www.cityofkingston.ca/pdf/cityhall/committees/planning/agenda/2008/PLN_A1608-SchedA.pdf</a><br /><div><br /></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.kingstonrealestateblog.com/2008/09/lowes-application-refused-for.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.kingstonrealestateblog.com/2008/09/lowes-application-refused-for.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Planning Applications</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">planning</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">refused</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:53:26 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Kingston would receive an additional $11 million</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p> The windfall is from last year's budget surplus. Municipalities
across Ontario will share in $1.1 billion announced by Premier Dalton
McGuinty at the Association of Municipalities of Ontario conference in
Ottawa. In the same announcement, municipalities were warned this
funding boost won't be duplicated next year.
</p><p>The funding assists municipalities like Kingston, which are
struggling with infrastructure deficits. The city is short $17 million
for road upgrades this year alone. <br /></p><p><a href="http://www.thewhig.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=1175679" target="_blank">http://www.thewhig.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=1175679</a><br /></p> ]]></description>
            <link>http://www.kingstonrealestateblog.com/2008/08/kingston-would-receive-an-addi.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.kingstonrealestateblog.com/2008/08/kingston-would-receive-an-addi.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Kingston News</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">news</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:22:54 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Harvey&apos;s and Swiss Chalet to Frontenac Mall?</title>
            <description><![CDATA[On June 9, 2008 applications for Site Plan Control and Zoning By-Law Amendment were submitted by RRVP Frontenac Mall Inc. for the property municipally know as 1300 Bath Road. The purpose of the applications is to facilitate the development of two additional free standing structures situated along the south property line for the purpose of establishing a Harvery's restaurant and a Swiss Chalet restaurant.<br /><br />Looks like they want to move next door from the corner at Bath Rd and Armstrong Rd where they are now. No more dealing with that pot hole at the entrance from Armstrong Road!<br /><br /><a href="http://www.cityofkingston.ca/pdf/cityhall/committees/planning/agenda/2008/PLN_A1508-SchedB.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.cityofkingston.ca/pdf/cityhall/committees/planning/agenda/2008/PLN_A1508-SchedB.pdf</a><br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://www.kingstonrealestateblog.com/2008/08/harveys-and-swiss-chalet-to-fr.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.kingstonrealestateblog.com/2008/08/harveys-and-swiss-chalet-to-fr.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Planning Applications</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">planning</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:54:32 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Real Estate Agents Must Confirm ID of Real Estate Buyers and Sellers by Law</title>
            <description><![CDATA[On June 23rd, 2008 new federal money laundering and anti-terrorist financing regulations came into effect that require real estate agents and brokers to collect personal identification information from buyers and sellers.<br /><br />Real Estate agents are now required to ask for proof of the identity
of all buyers or sellers involved in a Canadian real estate
transaction. If the client is a corporation, that information must
include corporate documentation, and the names of the corporation
directors. They must also ascertain if a third party is involved in the
transaction.<br /><br /><p>This also applies if a buyer or seller involved in a
transaction is not represented by a real estate agent, but the other
individual involved is represented. Those buying or selling privately
will be asked by the agent representing the other party involved in the
transaction to provide proof of identity as well, and that record must
be kept by the real estate agent involved in the transaction.</p><p>These
new regulations are part of federal legislation (Bill C-25) passed in
2007 that requires a number of industries, including real estate, to do
more to help stop money laundering and terrorist financing. The
regulations are enforced by the federal agency known as the Financial
Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada, or FINTRAC.</p><p>Additional information about this federal initiative, the federal legislation and the role of FINTRAC in the reporting system is available at <a href="http://www.fintrac-canafe.gc.ca/" target="_blank">www.fintrac-canafe.gc.ca</a> or call toll-free: 1-866-346-8722<br /></p> ]]></description>
            <link>http://www.kingstonrealestateblog.com/2008/08/real-estate-agents-must-confir.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.kingstonrealestateblog.com/2008/08/real-estate-agents-must-confir.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Canadian Real Estate</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:39:14 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>mls.ca is now realtor.ca</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>The Multiple Listing Service mls.ca is now <a href="http://www.realtor.ca/" target="_blank">www.realtor.ca. </a><br /></p><p><span id="_ctl0_StaticPage_lblStaticContent">The new home page provides four different ways to locate properties. <a href="http://www.realtor.ca/StaticPage.aspx?f=help_text_search">Text Search</a>, <a href="http://www.realtor.ca/StaticPage.aspx?f=help_interactive_map">Interactive Map Search</a>, <a href="http://www.realtor.ca/StaticPage.aspx?f=help_advanced_search">Advanced Search</a>, and <a href="http://www.realtor.ca/StaticPage.aspx?f=help_mls_search">MLS®# Search</a>. <br /></span></p><p><span id="_ctl0_StaticPage_lblStaticContent">Several additional options are also offered on the REALTOR.ca site-more than were available on the old <strong><em>mls.ca </em></strong> site. </span></p><p>This
national&nbsp;real estate database is the first source for Canadian
Real Estate Buyers and Sellers is now&nbsp;better than
ever and user friendly. It's pretty cool!<br /></p><a href="http://www.realtor.ca/" target="_blank">http://www.realtor.ca</a> <div><br /></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.kingstonrealestateblog.com/2008/08/mlsca-is-now-realtorca.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.kingstonrealestateblog.com/2008/08/mlsca-is-now-realtorca.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Canadian Real Estate</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Kingston Real Estate</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:28:39 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>
